qertdl.blogg.se - Terminal vs uxterm vs xterm

TERMINAL VS UXTERM VS XTERM INSTALL
TERMINAL VS UXTERM VS XTERM CODE

TERMINAL VS UXTERM VS XTERM INSTALL

To install the port: cd /usr/ports/x11/xterm/ & make install clean To add the package, run one of these commands: There are no Conflicts Matches for this port.

/usr/local/share/licenses/xterm-374/MIT.

/usr/local/share/licenses/xterm-374/LICENSE.

/usr/local/share/licenses/xterm-374/catalog.mk.

¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ pkg-plist: as obtained via: make generate-plist Expand this list (29 items) Collapse this list. Signal in systems derived from 4.3bsd), xterm will use theįacilities to notify programs running in the window whenever it Terminal resizing capabilities (for example, the SIGWINCH If the underlying operating system supports It provides DEC VT102/VT220 and Tektronix 4014Ĭompatible terminals for programs that can't use the window Maintainer: Port Added: 00:01:56 Last Update: 06:34:51 Commit Hash: 3654d26 People watching this port, also watch:: png, freetype2, gmake, expat, libXft License: MIT Description: The xterm program is the standard terminal emulator for the X Xterm Terminal emulator for the X Window Systemģ74 x11 =214 Version of this port present on the latest quarterly branch. NOTE: the Look for it right after the Description: on each port's home page. Want a good read? Try FreeBSD Mastery: Jails (IT Mastery Book 15)

If you want to send me a direct message with a explanation, I will be happy to discuss further the URL and web site.FreshPorts - x11/xterm: Terminal emulator for the X Window SystemĪs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. So we generally ask people to not put URL's in their signatures that are not personal, or related to technology/linux in some way as it could be misinterpreted as spam, and people have been blocked for that. Please specify 32 or 64bit in your questions, and please remove the URL from your signature block as its not linux related, does not appear to be a personal web site but business related (maybe your business?), and not related to technology. take a look at terminator.Ĭouple other quick notes.

If you are interested in a more feature rich terminal that does things like split windows, etc. So unless you have a specific application or question regarding terminal performance I suggest removing xterm from synaptic or removing the menu entries if they are causing confusion and just use lxterminal for LXDE. (So this is not a debate place for terminals - roxterm,xterm,uxterm,urxvt,terminator,tilda, etc) You are using the bash shell regardless of terminal choice - So unless you are programming or have other specific needs the average user uses whats included as the default. The average desktop user does not do much in the terminal except use it when a GUI does not meet their needs for what they are trying to accomplish.

TERMINAL VS UXTERM VS XTERM CODE

I will look into that for R9 and I am not sure about changing the code specific to the terminal as its a utility.Īs far as what terminal works best for your environment? Thats a debate that could go on forever. The cleanup that probably would be easiest is to simply remove the menu entries for both xterm and uxterm and remove said confusion. If you go look at the package in synaptic (xterm) you will see it says as much in the description, and when xterm is installed, uxterm is as well. Its a wrapper around xterm to provide locale and UTF-8.

uxterm is not a separate package (even though it has its own binay). (and I have not changed that code) I considered removing and changing the code before releasing R8, but it was left as is as it added negligible space and overhead and the effort and time made it an easy decision.ģ. xterm is required as the installer uses it and its coded to do as such. LXterminal comes with LXDE as part of the desktop environment so its included in the install and its a servicable terminal and functions well within LXDE.